- Select a blog category
- The European Commission is seeking views on the “benefits and drawbacks” of an individual “accountability regime” under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
- The proposals are at a formative stage, and it is uncertain whether they will ultimately be taken forward. Nonetheless, we recommend that Board members and senior managers pay close attention to how they unfold through the consultation process.
- Although the Commission has positioned these proposals as more of an extension of the existing fitness and propriety requirements, there are some potential parallels with the UK’s Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR).
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) agreed the final elements of the Basel III framework in December 2017 (often referred to by industry as ‘Basel IV’), but the timing and nature of its implementation in the EU is subject to a complex legislative negotiation that has yet to begin.
On 5 December, the UK’s financial regulators, the Bank of England (BoE), Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), published a series of consultation papers (CPs) on their proposed approach to operational resilience in the financial sector.
EIOPA’s extensive recent consultation1 on the 2020 review of Solvency II gives a first indication of the changes to Solvency II that EIOPA will recommend to the European Commission.
This blog highlights ten over-arching topics from the consultation that we consider indicate where significant change is and is not likely, and which in turn could have an important bearing on the UK’s post-Brexit prudential capital regime. Each topic is detailed in the appendix to this blog.
Last month, our article1 outlined our views on re-discovering customer lifetime value (“CLV”) within the capital markets sector. This month, we explore why adopting a CLV lens to customer lifecycle management can bring enhanced benefits for both corporate and investment banks (“CIB”) and their clients.
Alan Turing’s seminal 1950 paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", posed the question "Can machines think?" Introducing the idea of the first “learning machine with the potential of becoming artificially intelligent”. Since then machine learning (ML) has found its way into numerous processes; seeking to simplify our lives by making processes smarter, better and faster. Financial risk management is an industry that is rife with opportunities for ML to disrupt in the coming years, one of the most obvious areas being credit scoring.
In this blog we explore some of the main findings of the recently published Bank of England survey on ML, this is followed by our views on the challenges and potential solutions of implementing ML within a credit risk scoring framework.
On 31st October, the PRA published a Dear CEO letter to remind banks, building societies and designated investment firms that they are required to submit complete, timely and accurate regulatory returns. The fact that the PRA has seen the need to issue a reminder about such a core regulatory obligation reflects its concern about errors in regulatory reporting (both public and identified by the PRA in the course of its supervision) and what it sees as the need for appropriate investment in both data quality and processes to ensure the accuracy and completeness of reporting.
In this blog we consider how firms have been addressing regulatory reporting challenges to date, identify key areas of focus for Senior Managers, Boards and Audit Committees and provide our view on how firms might respond to the letter and how we can assist.
The FCA’s Feedback Statement focuses on greenwashing, disclosure and integration of material climate change risks and opportunities into business, risk and investment decisions.
Illiquid retail funds: FCA strengthens investor protection but drops some measures trailed in its consultation
With the spotlight falling increasingly on fund liquidity risks, not least from central banks concerned about emerging systemic risks, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published its final rules on liquidity risk management for non-UCITS retail schemes (NURS). The FCA started reviewing these rules after several property funds were suspended in the wake of the 2016 EU referendum. The FCA has stated that it has also taken into account lessons from the Woodford Equity Income Fund suspension in June 2019. Importantly, however, the new rules will not apply to UCITS funds such as the Woodford fund. We therefore expect further rule changes for such mainstream retail funds in the near term.
Two years of significant loss events, many of which have experienced significant loss deterioration, have exposed some limitations and areas of improvement of the ILS fund management industry. This should be expected of an industry whose core product hadn’t been tested through to the end of its lifecycle for several years, due to a series of benign cat years. The key lies in how the industry responds to these challenges, and determining how issues can be mitigated in the future to support the (still nascent) insurance securitisation process.