Pharmaceuticals in Thoughts from the Centre
- Select a blog category
by James Forsyth, Director, Deloitte MCS Limited, and Cameron McClearn, Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP
This week’s blog by James Forsyth (Director Deloitte MCS) and Cameron Mclearn (Principle Deloitte Consulting US) featured on the US Center for Health Solutions blog, A view from the Center, earlier this week.1 The article explores the challenges that are keeping biosimilar manufacturers from gaining more traction in the US market.
by Greg Reh, Vice Chairman, US and Global Life Sciences Leader, Deloitte LLP
This week’s blog by Greg Reh, Deloitte’s Global Life Sciences Leader first featured on the US Center for Health Solutions blog, A view from the Center.i In it Greg explores how emerging technologies can improve enrolment in, remove barriers of participation and increase drug adherence in pharma clinical trials.
by Greg Reh
Blockchain technology is continually touted to revolutionise the operations of every industry it becomes associated with, and for health care and life sciences this no different. This week’s blog, by Greg Reh, Deloitte’s Global Life Sciences and Health Care Leader, discusses the possible use cases blockchain may have in health care. The blog first appeared in on the US Center for Health Solutions website, part of their My Take series.i
by Pratik Avhad
India is one of the leading global producers of low-cost generic medicines due to its high domestic demand and inexpensive manufacturing costs. The country’s pharmaceutical market is the world’s third largest in terms of volume, but the thirteenth largest in value.1 However, counterfeiting is pervasive, with an estimated 20 per cent ($4.3 billion in 2013-14) of India’s drug market comprised of counterfeit drugs.2,3 While counterfeiting is a global issue, it is much more prevalent in low and middle income countries with an estimated 10 to 30 per cent of medicines in these countries being counterfeit, compared to just one per cent of medicines in high-income countries.4
by Thomas Croisier and James Forsyth, Deloitte Consulting, LLP
This week’s blog is by Tomas Croisier and James Forsyth, a partner and director in our life sciences consulting practice, respectively. It was first featured in a blog post on the US Center of Health Solutions site, and explores the impact of biosimilars may have on the treatment of oncology, particularly in the US.1
The term ‘revolution’ is often used to define a popular uprising that can lead to dramatic political changes. A dictator is overthrown, a new government is formed, a constitution is changed or replaced, and immeasurable impact on the country or even the world can occur. However, other types of revolutions also happen. Some of the most commonly known are industrial revolutions, which refer to breakthroughs in technology that change how industries function. We are now seeing the beginnings of a fourth industrial revolution – a fusing of technologies blurring the boundaries between the physical, digital and biological worlds.1 This blog highlights the issues that Deloitte believe will cause the most disruption for life sciences in 2018 as we embark on this fourth industrial revolution.
In December, we published our eighth annual report on Measuring the return from pharmaceutical innovation. This series of reports tracks the annual return on investment (ROI) that 12 leading biopharma companies (by 2009 R&D spend) are projected to achieve from their late-stage pipelines. For the third consecutive year, we also tracked the performance of an extension cohort of four mid-to-large cap biopharma companies in order to compare their performance with our original cohort. This week’s blog briefly summarises the performance of our two cohorts and then explores some emerging technologies that we anticipate should increase the productivity and efficiency by which drugs are discovered, developed and brought to patients.
This week, we published our eighth annual report on Measuring the return from pharmaceutical innovation. Our report tracks the annual return on investment that the 12 leading biopharma companies (by 2009 R&D spend) might expect to achieve from their late-stage pipelines, as well as tracking the performance of an extension cohort of four mid-to-large cap biopharma companies for the third consecutive year. This week's blog by Matthew Thaxter, an analyst at the centre, gives his take on the findings from this year’s report.
In 2014 we launched our first predictions report - Healthcare and life sciences predictions 2020: A bold future? It provided an intentionally positive and provocative view of what the world might look like in 2020. Since then the pace and scale of innovation has meant that some of these predictions are already a reality, while some are still some way off; yet others may never happen. Moreover, in the intervening years, the life sciences and health care industries are waking up to the fact that new science, automation and robotics will have a significant impact on the future of work. Last week we launched our newest predictions report - ‘The future awakens: Life Sciences and health care predictions 2022’. This week’s blog provides an overview of our six predictions and an example of the evidence today that enables us to say with some confidence what tomorrow might look like.
Computer and smart phone applications are pervasive across the world and cover almost every conceivable facet of a peoples lifestyle choices. As of March 2017, the two largest app stores had a collective library of apps totalling 5 billion.i However, as demonstrated by our report, ‘Pharma and the connected patient: How digital technology is enabling patient centricity’, the uptake of applications produced by Life Science companies remains low. This week’s blog is by David Rosner, a principle in the firm’s US practice, and it was recently featured on the US Centre for Health Solutions site.ii David references our report and explores some of the reasons for the low uptake of applications by Life Sciences companies.